You are free to reproduce any of the text of this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided proper attribution, credit and citation is given to the author, any original contributor or source, and the RRRA. Where photographs and diagrams carry additional copyright details, this Creative Commons license does not apply.
The Antonine Itinerary - Iter 1
From Bremenio (High Rochester, Northumberland)
To Praetorio (Bridlington, East Riding of Yorkshire)
The Iter almost certainly follows RR67c from Segontium to Canovium, the route of which is now known with reasonable certainty (Hopewell, 2013, pp. 27-34) and is just a mile more than the stated distance, an error which can be explained by measurement from a town-zone. The fact that no less than six milestones are known from it is indicative of the importance of this road.
The next stage, to Varis, is more problematic. The route of RR67b is not so well established with Margary describing a rather indirect and unlikely route (Margary, 1973, pp 349-50). Waddelove’s proposed route makes more sense (Waddelove, 1983), and his identification of the course of the road in St. Asaph approximately 400m south of the cathedral seems sound (Waddelove, 2004), supporting the long held assumption of St. Asaph being the location of Varis. Whilst a definite Roman settlement or fort has never been conclusively established, the town’s distance from Conovium (18 Roman miles) certainly fits and the scattered finds of coins, pottery and tile are certainly suggestive of Roman settlement. The discovery of ditches and road surfaces in the town have led to an interpretation of a probable fort (Waddelove 2004).
Assuming that Varis is St. Asaph, the route will have followed RR76a east and then along the coast. Rather than approach Chester along RR66a, the northern part of of which through Lache is far from certain, it is more likely that the Iter followed an extension of RR76a continuing further east to skirt around the south of the wetlands of the Dee estuary meeting RR6 near Eaton Hall. If so, the distance would be almost 33 Roman miles, agreeing well with the 32 miles of the Iter. Incidentally, the distance from St. Asaph to Chester is another example of inaccuracy in the measurements of true distances given in Rivet and Smith (Rivet & Smith 1979, p.172), as they state the true distance to Chester as being 34 miles.
Hopewell, D. (2013); Roman Roads in North-West Wales; Gwynedd Archaeological Trust, Bangor
Margary, I.D. (1973); Roman Roads in Britain (3rd Edition); Baker, London
Rivet, A.L.F. & Smith, Colin (1979); The Place-names of Roman Britain; B.T. Batsford Ltd., London
Rodwell, W., (1975); Milestones, Civic Territories and the Antonine Itinerary in Britannia, Volume 6, pp. 76-101
Waddelove, A.C. (1986); The Development of a Roman Road Network in the Lower Dee Valley Region before AD 117, unpub M. Phil, thesis University of Manchester
Waddelove, E. (1983); The Roman road between Varis and Canovium, Archaeologia Cambrensis vol. 132, pp.95-106
Waddelove, E. (2004); A Roman Fort at St. Asaph and the Location of Varis in Britannia, Volume 35, pp. 248-252
|
Itinerary Text
|
|
Itinerary Distance
|
|
Modern name
|
Actual Roman Miles
|
Error
|
Margary route number
|
Comment
|
|
Item a Segontio Devam, m.p. lxxiiii sic. (also, from Caernarvon to Chester, 74 miles)
|
|
Conovio
|
|
m.p. xxiii
|
|
Caerhun
|
24
|
-1
|
RR 67c
|
|
|
Varis
|
|
m.p. xviii
|
|
St Asaph?
|
18
|
0
|
RR 67b
|
|
|
Deva
|
|
m.p. xxxii
|
|
Chester
|
33
|
-1
|
RR 67a
|
|
|
Itinerary total
|
|
m.p. lxxiiii
|
|
|
|
|
Entry written and compiled by Mike Haken, last updated: 18 October 2017